Titik Balik Ekonomi Indonesia Pasca Kemerdekaan: Perspektif Materialisme Historis

Moch. Dimas Galuh Mahardika

doi:10.31258/hjps.2.2.55-64

Moch. Dimas Galuh Mahardika Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31258/hjps.2.2.55-64

Keywords: Meja Bundar Conference; Nationalization of foreign companies; Indonesia government; laborer; historical materialism

Abstract

Meja Bundar Conference held in Den Haag at 1949 was an achievement in the diplomatic process of the Indonesian nation to show its existence as an independent and politically sovereign country. However, on the economic aspect, the results of the conference did not favor the Indonesian government. The Dutch debt burden was imposed on the Indonesian government as a reciprocity for the Dutch recognition of Indonesia's political sovereignty. As a country that is young and unstablished economically yet, of course the requirements are very burdensome. Therefore, the government is looking for an effective way out to meet these requirements. One of the paths taken is to nationalize foreign companies that were still operating at the time. The decision also considered suitable to build the foundation of the national economy and dismantle the colonial economic system that had previously been formed. So to achieve this goal, political elites and society, especially laborer must be participated. This article, written using historical methods, aims to elaborate on the colaboration between political elites and laborer an effort to nationalize foreign companies in the 1950’s from a historical materialism perspective.

References

Basundoro, P. (2017). Minyak Bumi dalam Dinamika Politik dan Ekonomi Indonesia 1950–1960an. Airlangga University Press.

Boediono. (2016). Ekonomi Indonesia dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Penebir Mizan.

Booth, A. (1998). The Indonesian Cconomy in The Nineteenth and Twenthieth Centuries: A History of Missed Opportunities. Macmillan [u.a.].

Booth, A., O’Malley, W. J., & Weidemann, A. (1988). Sejarah Ekonomi Indonesia. Lembaga Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerangan Ekonomi dan Sosial.

Budi, L. S. (2013). Kisah di Balik Arsip: Kesepakatan Bidang Ekonomi dalam KMB dan Pasang Surut Hubungan Indonesia-Belanda. Majalah Arsip, Kemerdekaan dan Kebebasan Memperoleh Informasi, 16(1).

Chalmers, I. (1996). Konglomerasi: Negara dan Modal dalam Industri Otomotif Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka.

Crouch, H. A. (2007). The Army and Politics in Indonesia (1st Equinox ed). Equinox Pub.

Dharmawan, R. (2011). Inkonsistensi Gerakan Radikal Kiri: Praktik Politik Kaum Komunis di Indonesia. Kreasi Wacana.

Dick, H. W., Houben, V. J. H., Lindblad, J. T., & Thee, K. W. (Ed.). (2002). The Emergence of A National Economy: An Economic History of Indonesia, 1800-2000. Allen & Unwin [u.a.].

Frederick, W. H., & Soeroto, S. (2017). Pemahaman Sejarah Indonesia: Sebelum dan Sesudah Revolusi. Lembaga Penelitian Pendidikan dan Penerangan Ekonomi dan Sosial, (LP3ES).

Fuadi. (2015). Metode Historis: Suatu Kajian Materealisme Karl Marx. Substantia, 17(2), 220–230.

Ginting, B. (2007). Refleksi Historis Nasionalisasi Perusahaan Asing di Indonesia: Suatu Tantangan Terhadap Kepastian Hukum atas Kegiatan Investasi di Indonesia. 12(2), 101–111.

Hägerdal, H. (2009). Responding to The West: Essays on Colonial Domination and Asian Agency. Amsterdam University Press.

Hartono, R. (2008). Gerakan Banting Stir Ekonomi Soekarno: Haluan Ekonomi Anti Imperialisme. Berdikari, 9, 6–8.

Kanumoyoso, B. (2001). Nasionalisasi Perusahaan Belanda di Indonesia. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Kuntowijoyo. (2005). Pengantar llmu Sejarah. Bentang Pustaka.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1999). Pemikiran Karl Marx: Dari Sosialisme Utopis ke Perselisihan Revisionisme. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mahardika, M. D. G., & Ramadhan, F. N. (2021). Dugaan Penyelewengan Program Ekonomi Benteng Untuk Kepentingan Pemilihan Umum 1955. Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah, 4(2), 123–130.

Mintz, J. S. (2002). Muhammad, Marx, Marhaen: Akar sosialisme Indonesia. Pustaka Pelajar.

Mortimer, R. (2006). Indonesian Communism Under Sukarno: Ideology and Politics, 1959-1965 (1st Equinox ed). Equinox Pub.

Nurbaity, Hidayat, A., & Hidayat, F. (2019). Dinamika Nasionalisasi De Javasche Bank: Sebuah Perjuangan Menjadi Bank Indonesia (1950-1953). Seminar Nasional Sejarah Ke-4 Jurusan Pendidikan Sejarah Universitas Negeri Padang.

Platje, W. (2001). Dutch Sigint and the Conflict with Indonesia 1950-62. Intelligence and National Security, 16(1), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/714002840

Ricklefs, M. C. (2007). Sejarah Indonesia Modern. Serambi Ilmu.

Sayer, D. (1987). The Violence of Abstraction: The Analytic Foundations of Historical Materialism. B. Blackwell.

Sismudjito. (2015). Nasionalisasi Perusahaan Hindia Belanda dalam Perspektif Sosiologi. Seminar Nasional Program Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Berbasis Komunitas Implementasi Konsep Triple Bottom Lines.

Soekarno. (2012). Nasionalisme, Islamisme, dan Marxisme (Cetakan pertama). Kreasi Wacana.

Surowo, B. (2016). KPM Versus Pelni: Persaingan Merebut Hegemoni Jaringan Pelayaran di Nusantara, 1945-1960. Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha, 1(1), 11–23.

Thee, K. W. (2005). Pelaku Berkisah: Ekonomi Indonesia 1950-an Sampai 1990-an. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Vickers, A. (2005). A History of Modern Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.

Vidal, M., Smith, T., Rotta, T., & Prew, P. (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx. Oxford University Press.

Wasino. (2016). Nasionalisasi Perusahaan-Perusahaan Asing Menuju Ekonomi Berdikari. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 26(1), 62–71.

Wasino, dkk. (2019). Plantation Capitalism and Peasant Economy in Java at the Dutch Colonial Time (Cet. 1). LPPM Unnes.

Zanden, J. L. van, & Marks, D. (2013). An Economic History of Indonesia: 1800-2010. Routledge.

Zed, M. (2004). Metode Peneletian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.